Friday, July 31, 2009

由头到尾翁诗杰和蔡细历之争到底是为了什么?

看着翁诗杰和蔡细历的斗争呈白热化,局外人一定很感兴趣,到底这两个加起来都超过一百岁的老人到底想要怎样。让我们来回顾回顾,可能可以理出一个端倪。

去年党选以前,蔡细历和翁诗杰基本上没有什么恩怨。当然AB队之争,那是有的。只不过翁诗杰从来就不是和蔡细历在同一个线上对抗,所以没有直接冲突。而蔡细历也从来不认为翁诗杰够班和他同列一个级别。一切的开始,是马华去年党选。

蔡细历一开始就剑指总会长,无论是言论或过后的竞选宣言都处处透露了端倪。只不过对手有点出乎预料的变成翁诗杰过后,衡量轻重就打署理总会长。而翁诗杰一开始也以蔡细历为主要对手,对其不道德事件和作为大肆开炮。对翁诗杰来说,这无可厚非,那是个人的道德观,但是蔡细历就认为翁诗杰有意刁难。这是埋下两人恩怨的第一个伏笔。

蔡细历过后成功突破菜单当选署理总会长。在他眼中,作为马华署理总会长一个部长职位是必然的。虽然马华历史上总会长(陈祯禄、林苍佑、陈群川)也曾经由头到尾无官一身轻,但是蔡细历眼中这个部长一定不可以漏了他这个第二把交椅。这可以从他 “如果有人以巫统不同意来隐瞒不推荐的事实,他一定可以知道” 的言论预见一般。当然我们根据其支持者和亲密战友的言论,也可以看到蔡细历同时对州联委会主席志在必得。

至于后来怎样,我们也看到了,翁诗杰没有推荐他出任部长,也没有委任他担任州联委会主席,反而自己一屁股坐上了蔡细历的地盘 柔佛州的主席。以至于一向来由署理总会长担任的纪律委员会主席,也因为蔡细历个人不光彩的背景不能在党纪上服众,而另委任元老黄俊杰出任。于是第一个矛盾 闹性丑闻的署理总会长没有依照传统出任相关党职和官职 成形了。

蔡细历对翁诗杰这样的一个决定有几不服气我不太清楚。不过翁诗杰重新装修马华总部办公室的事件,倒是被蔡细历引用,作为被边缘化的证据。我没有上过马华总会长的办公室,所以不清楚到底新格局是否真的颠覆了以前的布局,而让蔡细历忿忿不平。不过翁诗杰如果认为可以用这么一个方法就可以边缘化某人,那的确是脑子少了一根筋。作为一个在政海浮游了二十載的政治人物,如此幼稚真的是可悲。这个事件过后蔡细历就认为翁诗杰存心为难,矛盾就升级为对抗了。

之后就是蔡细历上演退党风波,提出他与蔡智勇可能因为在马华内部无法发挥功能而蝉过别枝。翁诗杰的反应还是一贯的 发出退党的人是在威胁党。坦白说在这一点上面我认为蔡细历就远远没有蔡锐明这么干脆利落了。我个人到现在认为这只不过是蔡细历以退为进,引人注目的手段而已,而我个人绝对不认同蔡细历这么一个做法。要就如蔡锐明般交代好“后事”之后,拍拍屁股走人,不带走一片云彩,何必这么欲拒还迎?

在纳吉插手下,蔡细历倒是获得了他期待已久的平台:国阵总协调。老实说开始的时候我也不太明白纳吉这么一个布局到底葫芦里买什么药,只不过看着老大和老二演下去,对这场戏也有一点了解了,只不过还有几个疑问不很明白,如下:

蔡细历首先向媒体公布了他在国阵总部的办公室,并高调带领记者参观。很有争锋相对的味道。不过也是找无可厚非,原本的办公室小了,给人看看自己新的办公室也是应该的。只不过这样一来,好像也很幼稚。

纳吉委任蔡细历作为总协调,并没有文明规定权限在那里。一开始 看起来这个也很像是一个虚衔。不过过后看到蔡细历巡回马来西亚会见基层,好像这个职位又有一定的地位和权势。那么到底纳吉是要蔡细历干什么呢?那么这个国阵总协调,工作范围和影响力到哪里?友党又会不会卖面子呢?从网络和报章上来看,蔡细历几乎都只和马华基层互动而已,甚至坊间流传蔡细历刻意羞辱蔡锐明,那才是压倒骆驼的最后一根稻草。

问题二延伸出来的假设性问题(一) 如果蔡细历真的有实权,那么未来上阵人选以蔡细历的意见为主,还是以各党党主席为凭呢?无论如何这个结果对马华是一件好事,因为马华本来梦寐以求在国阵架构里头可以挣得署理主席,或者是重夺当年(联盟)的总秘书,甚至总财政。现在由蔡细历出任实权的总协调,总算有一个突破,蔡细历也将名流青史。

假设性问题之二 如果蔡细历没有实权,那么马华就倒霉了。那只不过是纳吉在操弄马华的一宗手段。看到老二被边缘化,就以蔡细历制衡翁诗杰。翁诗杰一向来和巫统中人关系不太好,一来他并没有花太多时间和他们打交道,二来翁诗杰一向来的政治洁癖造成他对所谓的朋党不屑一顾,加上他非黑即白、斗鸡的表现 干捞事件、自贸区等都是制造尴尬给国阵的源头,可想而知巫统怎会不对他感冒?蔡细历恰好就是制衡斗鸡的利器。这么一来,马华的未来就很可悲了。

(当然以上都是假设,别告我上法庭)

自贸区捅了蜜蜂窝过后,老翁面对很大的压力。蔡细历在这个关键的时候,有没有和他共同抗敌,这个不可而知。在舆论上到没有看到蔡细历很清楚表明全力支持翁诗杰彻弊案,也许就是因为这样翁诗杰认为他打算从旁击,或者乘机联合外敌一拼铲除他。我只是从翁诗杰和蔡细历之间的对垒推测出来的,真实性如何,可能真的要等两位当事人未来出回忆录才会懂。

至于蔡细历重新被提交到纪委会,一般上人家都认为是纪委会在老翁的指示下重新把盖棺定论的档案拿出来翻查。不过人们总是忽略了,那是因为有投诉,而不是重启档案。黄俊杰只不过把陈广才卸任前没有解决的档案一次过完结他们。这是程序的问题。至于蔡细历应不应该被冻结党纪,那个真的是见仁见智了。而翁诗杰干涉纪委会的工作,那个就要看看黄俊杰卖不卖面子,但是到最后都是会长理事会的权利。

只不过怎样都好当权派都没有权利要求党员禁口。那是绝对违反人身自由的做法!表达意见是每个人的权利,凭什么你叫我们闭口?不过我倒不需要,因为我不是马华党员。 只不过明知道禁口令是行不通的,还硬是叫人闭嘴,这不是笨蛋,是什么?

所以总结,这两个加起来上百岁的老人,是不是很无聊呢?

7 comments:

进意 said...

你还写,你更无聊...

Tze Howe, 9W2THO said...

fever + 泻肚子,Nothing to do ma !

Anonymous said...

Hi Mr Ooi,

You said: "...蔡细历重新被提交到纪委会,一般上人家都认为是纪委会在老翁的指示下重新把盖棺定论的档案拿出来翻查。不过人们总是忽略了,那是因为有投诉,而不是重启档案。黄俊杰只不过把陈广才卸任前没有解决的档案一次过完结他们。这是程序的问题 ..."

Sorry, I am totally against this statement even though I do agree with many of the issues in your article. Please refer to the link malaysiakini/cn
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/109219 :

Quote: 马华前纪律委员会成员何仁德发表文告指出,蔡细历性爱光碟事件发生后,就有其中一名区会领袖向马华中央提出投诉。当时的中委会已经对有关事件进行讨论和决定,将有关投诉个案转交予纪律委员会进一步审理。

他说,在一次的会议中,纪律委员会鉴于蔡细历已向党最高领导层交待,议决让会长理事会定夺。与此同时,中委会也接受接受蔡细历事后立即辞去党职官职的自罚行动而通过终结此个案。前领导层关档,如今翻旧案?

因此他质问,前届中央领导层既已关闭档案,为何事隔多时,当今的纪律委员会要旧案重翻?

何仁德曾出任3届的马华中委成员,两届会长理事会成员及一届纪律委员会成员。

他说,对于来自基层的投诉,必须经过中委会或会长理事会筛选,认为投案者不含虚报或作弊成分,才交由纪委会进一步审理,这是党一贯的程序。

“这次开档重审蔡细历,是否得到中委成员的同意?”unquote.

So what do you think?

This is definitely an abuse of power. Do you know that 'Abuse of Power' can be charged by MACC to court? There are 3 types of corruption being defined by MACC:
1. Corruption of Money / there is monetary gain
2. Corruption of Time.
3. Corruption of power.
MACC can file a case against anyone committing any of the three mentioned above.

In fact many non MCA members also do not agree with this case, including the Malays, Chinese and Indians.

Tze Howe, 9W2THO said...

well, in that case then Dr Chua should file a complain to MACC, thats a must ! ....

Tze Howe, 9W2THO said...

Anonymous 兄,

hahha, u seems note on my article quite frequent also ...

might hang out for a tea ...

can contact me in personal .

0125595993

or email ooi_tze_howe@yahoo.com

Anonymous said...

Mr Ooi,
Thanks for giving me your email and contact number, noted. Sorry i don't post email and number here for some reason. I will, if there is any opportunity, find time to hang out with you for a drink if you don't mind to have a drink with mature man, haha. You are from USM or UUM?

Yes, I do frequent your blog here simply I do enjoy reading your simple way of writing, meaningful and suggestive even though you were a bit too careful in a way lacking some 'force' and constructive criticism due to your age limit and experiences in real life (sorry, I am a very frank person, because aquarians are always very far sighted and critical, ahah), and seems you had stopped writing a more than a week. Maybe you were busy with your studies or assignments, haha.

Dear Mr. Ooi, I can sense that you are one of those so called 'hot blooded youths' (in chinese , haha) like the youngsters in the film show 'Top Guns', so keep up your good work as a new-age blogger and other enterprises. Just a little humble reminder, we at times need to do a little extra and some research before we give comments verbally or in writing so that our conversation and writing will be more substantial and meaningful and it's fair to other people, right? I sincerely hope you don't fall into the trap by simplying the non-sense some of the so called new-age people do and write without doing any research. I am in fact very touched by the newspaper report at the end of your block mentioning the street dance. I agree with what you had said (don't think that all the old people are against street dances. (I am young at heart, ahha). In fact, years back, the government was very against Hip-Hop and other street dances, nowadays it's a bit different and is more open.
Buddha Bless you.
In Dhamma.

Tze Howe, 9W2THO said...

thats why i nv request ur hp or email from you ....

wahah .. u can contact me anything .. glad too ...

i m from Penang, but i study in UPM, jus graduated ...

nice to meet u ... any comment for me is most welcomed ... i hope to hear comment from u in future .. thats make me improve .. !